What will it take to achieve the vision of making India a $5 trillion economy by 2024? CW has
some answers
Every great
dream starts
with a dreamer.
But it takes an
achiever to
translate that
dream into
reality. India's
Prime Minister Narendra Modi is
determined to make ...
What will it take to achieve the vision of making India a $5 trillion economy by 2024? CW has
some answers
Every great
dream starts
with a dreamer.
But it takes an
achiever to
translate that
dream into
reality. India's
Prime Minister Narendra Modi is
determined to make the transition
from dreamer to achiever with his
vision to make India a $5 trillion
economy by 2024.
This ambitious target has
triggered a host of interesting
debates. While some contend the
Prime Minister may be aiming too
low, more people view it as mere
wishful thinking, especially
considering the prevailing macro
indicators. But as they say,
‘The greatest danger for most of
us is not that our aim is too high
and we miss it, but that it is too
low and we reach it.� Thus,
naysayers aside, at CW we believe
it is more prudent to discuss the
different ways to achieve such a
target than the target itself!
The Prime Minister’s aspiration
is a bold one that calls for thinking
out-of-the-box and breaking old
paradigms of economic growth
and development. The
government’s success in doing
these will be the game-changer.
For economic development,
aiming big is essential �
historically, only a target-based
approach backed by a solid
roadmap has delivered in
economies that have achieved
great scale. Naturally, looking at
the current economic scenario,
India will have to get its act
together to unblock stalled
projects (because of policy issues
or financial unviability) and
eliminate policy shortcomings.
Thus, with our core focus on the
construction and infrastructure
sector, we will elaborate upon our
thoughts on how infrastructure
can contribute to achieve the
$5 trillion target.
To understand the future,
though, it is important to analyse
the past and examine how the
Indian economy has performed
and what contributed to its growth.
From past to present
There is no denying that India
has made its mark on the global
map, consistently featuring on the
list of the fastest growing
economies in the world. In fact, it
also managed to enjoy the top slot
for a few years among large-size
economies. Not surprisingly, the
country became a favoured
destination for foreign investors
with its length, breadth and depth
in consumption demand. A few
reforms on the policy front also
helped the economy recover
quickly at a time when global
economies were struggling.
The chart on 'India GDP', in the
following page, clearly indicates
that it took India almost 60 years
after Independence to reach the
first US$ trillion mark. This was
despite the fact that the country
opened its economy in 1991 with
liberalisation, privatisation and
globalisation with the goal of
making the economy more market
and service-oriented, and
expanding the role of private and
foreign investment. This surely
helped the Indian economy come
back from the abyss but the
$1 trillion mark was still a distant
dream. It was only in the year
2000 that the government planned
one of the biggest and boldest
infrastructure reforms: The Golden
Quadrilateral project. Although it
faced a lot of hurdles, it gave the
economy a much-needed impetus
to move towards the $1 trillion
mark. It took another seven years,
following slowdown and some
amount of policy paralysis, to
actually reach the goal in 2007.
In 2014, after another seven years,
India became a $2 trillion
economy. In simple words, the
first trillion took 60 years; the
second was added in just seven.
Today, India is almost a
$3 trillion economy; this means it
has added another $1 trillion in
just five years, despite momentous
events like demonetisation and
implementation of GST. With the
time taken to add $1 trillion
constantly reducing, it begs the
question: Can another $2 trillion
be added in just five years?
One needs to understand that
simple arithmetic won’t work here!
There are two aspects to achieving
the $5 trillion target: First, inflation
should remain under control. And
second, as the target is set in
US$ terms, the rupee-dollar
exchange rate needs to be in
check to make India reach the
desired target. The Indian rupee
has depreciated a bit recently and
if it depreciates further, it will
adversely affect India's GDP
growth in dollar terms. However, if
it starts appreciating against the
dollar, it will make it easier to reach
the target. With regard to inflation,
the rate in India is just above
3 per cent and even global inflation
is not very high. Thus the outlook
for inflation looks largely benign,
increasing India’s chances to
achieve the target.
The three segments of the
Indian economy
Now, let’s understand sectoral
contribution to India’s GDP.
It is a known fact that if an
object in mounted on three legs
(even of different heights or
lengths), it remains steady.
Similarly, the Indian economy has
three major segments � their
contributions are different but,
together, they keep the economy
stable: Agriculture, Industry and
Services. Obviously, there are
sub-segments under these three
but to keep things simple, thisbroader segmentation is useful.
While services constitute various
sub-segments like trade, hotels,
transport, communication,
broadcasting, IT, financial
services, public administration and
defence, the industrial segment
comprises mining, manufacturing,
electricity, capital goods,
infrastructure, construction and
other utility services.
If we take a look at thehistorical data points, we see that
the contribution of the three main
segments has changed
significantly from FY1951 to FY19.
The chart above clearly shows
how India has managed to move
from an agrarian economy to a
services-led one. Thanks to
exports like IT and IT-enabled
services and growth of financial
and other data-oriented services,
the services segment contributes
more than 50 per cent to the
Indian GDP today. Meanwhile,
agriculture,which was contributing
over 51 per cent in 1951, has now
come down significantly to touch
around 15-16 per cent.
One peculiarity about India’s
growth record is that it is the only
large global economy that has
grown without a significant
manufacturing base. Policymakers
have tried to address this;
for instance, the Make in India
initiative is an attempt to attract
manufacturing investments.
However, its success has been
patchy at best � industry accounts
for just 27-28 per cent of GDP,
way behind services. There is now
a view that India’s policymakers
should not try and emulate the
time-tested path of moving first to
manufacturing and then to
services-led growth.
Focus on industry segment
To maintain growth momentum
in a fast-moving world, India has
to develop its industry and
infrastructure. As an emerging
economy, the scope for this is
enormous. To experience the
potential of the perfect blend of
industry and next-generation
infrastructure, it is necessary to
clear the decks that are obstructing
the way forward. It is true that
industry focus (manufacturing)
requires more capital, which is
scarce at present. However, we
believe the capital will find its own
way if there are viable industrial
projects. Further, while the
government is taking steps to
keep the liquidity flow abundant,
public investment alone cannot
fund our entire infrastructure
investment requirements. Also,
private players are usually eager
to bring their capital into
developed Indian states compared
to less developed ones. Therefore,
the real challenge lies in bringing
adequate private investment
across the country with the
collaboration of the public sector.
If we look at the revenues oflarge firms as a share of GDP, it is
around 40 per cent in India while,
in China, it is about 70 per cent.
For India to be a $5 trillion
economy, we need an increase in
the number of large companies
contributing to GDP. Even simple
maths suggests that India needs
to generate another 2,000 large
firms to really establish the kind of
economic growth rate required to
achieve the target. This will only
happen if more MSMEs become
bigger, and more mid-sized firms
become large firms.
Why industry and
infrastructure?
Remember, industry
encompasses automation in
industrial sectors whereas
infrastructure brings physical
infrastructure together with
technology like Internet of Things
(IoT) and automation together to
maximise its efficiency. For
smooth and fast travel, India
needs adequate and timely
investment in quality
infrastructure. Further, to create a
$5 trillion economy by 2024, we
need robust and resilient
infrastructure, as it is infrastructure
investment that has guided the
growth of developed countries.
There is a thumb rule that
a country must spend at least
8 per cent of its GDP on
infrastructure. China has been
doing this for two decades and
the results are apparent, even
helping the country post doubledigit
growth in the past.
In India, infrastructure spending
(construction, utilities and other
infra) as a percentage of GDP was
less than 5 per cent till 2006.
It was eventually increased after
2008 and has remained above the
7 per cent mark. (If we only
consider construction and infra,
the figures are still less than
5 per cent).However,we need to
increase spending further to
achieve the $5 trillion target.
Underlining the strong relationship
between the economy and
infrastructure, data suggests that
the correlation of investments in
inland, road, rail and airport
infrastructure to GDP is higher
than 0.90.
India needs to spend
7-8 per cent of its GDP on
infrastructure annually, which
translates into an annual infra
investment of $200 billion currently.
However, India has been able to
spend only about $100-110 billion
annually on infrastructure, leaving a
deficit of around $90 billion per
annum. This huge investment gap
needs funding through different
and innovative approaches.
Private capital and
participation required!
In India, infrastructure has
historically been financed by the
public sector. Given the fiscal
constraints that leave less room
for expanding public investment at
the scale required, there is an
urgent need to accelerate the flow
of private capital into infrastructure.
With the aim to boost
investment in infrastructure, the
National Investment and
Infrastructure Fund has been
created with capital of about
`400 billion to provide investment
opportunities to commercially
viable projects. In addition, a
Credit Enhancement Fund for
infrastructure projects to increase
the credit rating of bonds floated
by infrastructure companies is
going to be launched in the
country. A new credit rating
system for infrastructure projects,
based on the expected loss
approach, has also been launched
that seeks to provide an additional
risk assessment mechanism for
informed decision-making by
long-term investors. Further,
measures like infrastructure
investment trusts and real-estate
investment trusts (REITs) have
been formulated to pool
investment in infrastructure.
This has helped attract private
participation to some extent.
However, there is still a larger
need for funding. Private capex is
yet to increase; hence, steps are
required in this direction.
Apart from this, the
government's decision to
consolidate 10 public-sector
banks (PSB) into four mega
state-owned lenders will act as a
building block to achieve the
$5 trillion target. As the Finance
Secretary stated, “We will now
have six mega banks with
enhanced capital base, size, scale
and efficiency to support the high
growth the country requires to
break into the club of middleincome
nations.�
Other notable actions planned
by the government include a push
to the digital economy, private
investment, fiscal discipline,
structural reforms, provisions for
credit growth and, most important,
financing by the capital market.
The government is also committed
to clear the mess in the financial
system (rising NPAs), which would
commence the virtual investment
cycle. As the cycle starts, a few
segments are likely to be focus
areas in terms of public and
private expenditure.
Focus on roads, railways,
aviation and ports
Former US President
John F Kennedy once famously
said, “American roads are not
good because America is rich;
America is rich because American
roads are good.� Undoubtedly,
roads are part of an integrated
multimodal system of transport
that provides crucial links to
airports, railway stations, ports
and other logistical hubs. Road
infrastructure acts as a catalyst for
economic growth by playing a
critical role in supply chain
management, especially in India
where the dependency of logistical
movement on roads is higher than
other countries. It is the dominant
mode of transportation in
comparison with rail, air traffic and
inland waterways and accounts
for about 3.14 per cent of GVA
and 69 per cent and 90 per cent of
countrywide freight and passenger
traffic, respectively. Thus,
significant investment is being
made in the roads segment by
public and private players.
That said, road development
faces challenges like availability of
funds for financing large-scale
projects, lengthy processes in
acquisition of land and payment of
compensation to beneficiaries,
environmental concerns, time and
cost overruns owing to delays in
project implementation and lesser
traffic growth than expected.
These are increasing the riskiness
of projects and resulting in stalled
or languishing projects and
shortfall in funds for maintenance.
However, increase in the pace of
construction has been achieved
by introducing a proactive sector
policy to respond to these major
challenges. This includes process
streamlining, enhanced delegation
of approval limits, inter-ministerial
coordination and innovative
project financing for leveraging
private and public funding. Even
the streamlining of land acquisition
processes has been a positive step.
Huge investments have been
made in the sector with total
investment increasing over three
times to Rs.1,588.39 billion in FY19
from Rs.519.14 billion in FY15.
In India, investments in roads have
been financed from budgetary
support, internal and extrabudgetary
resources (IEBR) and
private-sector investment.
Budgetary support accounted for
48 per cent of investments in
2018-19 and IEBR accounted for
39 per cent, with private
investment accounting for
14 per cent. Private-sector
investment has been tardy as
investors are interested in shortterm
investments while NHAI and
NHIDCL were looking for long-
term borrowing arrangements
keeping in view the long gestation
period of road projects. Once the
economic scenario starts
providing positive signals, we
expect the roads segment to
witness a lot of traction.
In addition to roads, investment
is being made in the railways
and aviation sectors as well.
The bullet train project in railways
and UDAN in aviation are
milestones in this regard. Apart
from this, the ports sector is
crucial for the development of the
economy as ports handle around
90 per cent of export-import cargo
by volume and 70 per cent by
value. To meet the ever-increasing
trade requirements (larger exports
with a focus on manufacturing),
expansion of port capacity has
been accorded the highest priority
with implementation of wellconceived
infrastructure
development projects. Even inland
waterways can be utilised to save
costs and investment are being
made accordingly.
Housing is one of the fastest
moving sectors in the country.
With urbanisation becoming an
irreversible process, housing is an
important determinant of
economic growth. The process
has been characterised by an
increase in the number of large
cities, although India can be said
to be in the midst of a transition
from a predominantly rural to a
quasi-urban society. Many reforms
have been implemented in the
housing sector with RERA being a
prominent one. In addition, the
Pradhan Mantri Aawas Yojana
(PMAY) was launched on June 25,
2015, with the objective to provide
housing facilities to all eligible
beneficiaries by 2022. This will
also give a lot of impetus to allied
sectors like cement and steel.
Considering the above projects,
the government estimates
infrastructure investments worth
`100 trillion over the next five
years � an average of Rs.20 trillion a
year. This is far greater than the
current infrastructure spend,
which is barely one-third of what
is estimated. The key question is
where the money will come from.
India does not have powerful
institutions that can fund longgestation
infrastructure projects.
Banks do not have enough
long-term liabilities to match such
loans. Lenders have gone terribly
wrong in the past by not following
healthy lending practices. Without
credit flow to support private
investment and cheaper, abundant
and good quality electricity to
power growth, this GDP target
may well remain an aspiration.
Current economic scenario �
not looking bright
In terms of the current domestic
economic scenario, a slowdown in
investment activity, tighter funding
conditions, decline in consumer
confidence, high real interest rates
and Central Government
expenditure and the monsoon are
some factors that have
contributed to overall
sluggishness. Corporate financial
performance is not improving,
automobile sales volumes are on a
decline and FMCG sales are also
sluggish. Add to all this, issues
like the NBFC liquidity crisis and
banking NPAs, and it appears
nothing is going right. Further,
corporate taxes are yet to decline
and the move of taxing high
net-worth individuals and FPIs
have actually resulted in capital
outflows from Indian markets.
Although the government has
taken a few steps to smooth
things over, these do not seem to
be sufficient. Making matters
worse are the weak global
macroeconomic conditions and a
negative fiscal impulse.
However, this is a phase of
transition where the cleaning of
books is happening and is
expected to eventually lead to
better and faster economic
growth. The government has
constituted a high-level task force
(headed by the Economic Affairs
Secretary) to identify infrastructure
projects for Rs.100 trillion
investment by 2024-25. It will
draw up a National Infrastructure
Pipeline of Rs.100 trillion, which will
include greenfield and brownfield
projects worth over Rs.1 trillion
each. The task force will comprise
secretaries from different
ministries. Each ministry and
department will be responsible for
monitoring projects to ensure their
timely implementation within budget.
In conclusion
While the debate continues
about whether the $5 trillion target
can actually be achieved, the
focus should be on getting on
with the job ahead. India requires
a nominal growth of over
11 per cent to reach the target.In conclusion
From focus on industrial growth
and improved services exports to
participation of private players in
infrastructure projects, we have
listed a few factors that would
help the government achieve its
aim. In tandem, managing inflation
and currency movement should
also play a vital role. All
considered, increased infrastructure
spending will be the key. If
financing for infrastructure is
arranged and managed well,
a dream that looks distant now
may become attainable. And, even
if the target is not achieved, such
a focus will put the country on a
faster growth path. It’s high time
all stakeholders participate and
contribute to building a brighter
future for India.In conclusion
Few Factors Towards the Roadmap to the
US$5 Trillion Target
India still faces a spending gap in infrastructure, and hence, there is an
immediate action needed to double the infrastructure spending.
Considering the current fiscal scenario it is difficult for the Centre alone to meet
such project spending, and hence, increased private participation is the need in
terms of capital infusion as well as project execution.
Many projects are stalled due to non-availability of finance and a few have
become financially unviable. More and more funding avenues must be provided
through innovative financing instruments.
Although the mega mergre of PSU banks is one step towards the same, an
appraisal system needs to get an overhaul.
Services growth has been good over the years, but it is high time that the
government focuses on industrial growth. Manufacturing base should be
expanded. ‘Make in India� was one such project but more efforts are required to
make India a global manufacturing hub.
Increased participation by the states is the need of an hour. Currently, only a few
states are participating.
No economic growth is possible unless poverty is reduced, and hence, more
social stability reforms (without affecting the fiscal prudence) are required.
Reduced tax burden on Corporate (or reduced tax terror � in a raw language)
is what Indian Inc expects from the government. Unless the large businesses
feel comfortable and chart out expansion plans, the US$5 trillion target will be a
distant dream.
Increased digitisation � India has moved towards digitisation in terms of payment,
money transfers and a few other limited segments. But the complete adoption of
digitisation could add about a trillion dollars to India’s GDP by 2025.